Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸°­Á¾¾ç °ñÀýÁ¦ ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¼öº¹ ½Ã ¿¬Á¶Á÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °í·Á»çÇ×

Soft tissue consideration in oral rehabilitation using implant in a patient after oral tumor resection

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 55±Ç 4È£ p.458 ~ 466
ÀÌ¿µÈÆ, °í°æÈ£, ÇãÀ±Çõ, ¹ÚÂùÁø, Á¶¸®¶ó,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ¿µÈÆ ( Lee Young-Hoon ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
°í°æÈ£ ( Ko Kyoung-Ho ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÇãÀ±Çõ ( Huh Yoon-Hyuk ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÂùÁø ( Park Chan-Jin ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶¸®¶ó ( Cho Lee-Ra ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

±¸°­Á¾¾çÀ» ÀýÁ¦ÇÑ °æ¿ì ¾Ç¾È¸é ±¸Á¶ÀÇ »ó½Ç·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ßÀ½, ÀúÀÛ, ½É¹Ì µî ±â´ÉÀå¾Ö¸¦ À¯¹ßÇÏ°Ô µÇ¹Ç·Î ±â´Éȸº¹À» À§ÇØ º¸Ã¶ ¼öº¹ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. À̶§ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¸é º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ±â´É Çâ»óÀ» ±â´ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ °ñÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ÈÄ, À̽İñÀÇ ¼º°ø·ü°ú´Â º°°³·Î ¿¬Á¶Á÷ÀÌ °¨¿°¿¡ Ãë¾àÇÑ ÇüŸ¦ °®±â ½¬¿ì¸ç À̽İñÀº ¿°Áõ¿¡ ÀÌȯµÈ °æ¿ì ºü¸¥ ¼Óµµ·Î Æı«°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¼º°øÀûÀÎ º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¿¡ ¾Õ¼­ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¿¬Á¶Á÷ óġ¿Í º¸Ã¶¼öº¹ ÈÄ ÀæÀº Á¤±â°ËÁøÀ» ÅëÇØ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄ¿Í ¿¬°üµÈ °¢º°ÇÑ ÁÖÀÇ°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.

After the resection of oral tumor, defected maxillofacial structure caused functional difficulties including phonetics, mastication and esthetic aspects. In this cases, implant retained prosthesis can contribute to the functional enhancement. Regardless of the success rate in grafted bone, however, the soft tissue usually had a shape which was susceptible to inflammation. Moreover, infected graft bone presented rapid destruction. For success of the prosthetic treatment, adequate soft tissue treatment and frequent recall check are the essential factors to the successful implant prognosis.

Å°¿öµå

¾Ç¾È¸é º¸Ã¶; ±¸°­Á¾¾ç; °ñÀýÁ¦¼ú; ÀÓÇöõÆ®; ¿¬Á¶Á÷ óġ
Maxillofacial prosthesis; Oral tumor; Bone resection; Implant; Soft tissue treatment

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed